• Home
  • Contact
  • FAQs
    • What is Webcomics.com?
    • Member Benefits
    • How To Post an Article or News Item
    • How to Post a Webcomic on the List
    • How to Post a Comic
    • Terms of Service
  • Forums
  • WebComics List
  • Benefits
    • Print Vendors: Get multiple quotes
    • Banner stand: Discount
    • Consultation discount
    • “How To Make Webcomics” book: discount
    • “Webcomics Handbook”: discount
    • ALL benefits
  • My Account
    • Welcome
    • What is Webcomics.com?
    • My Subscription
    • Join us!
  • Account
  • Membership List
Twitter Email RSS

Webcomics.com

How To Make WebComics

WebComic Handbook

‹ Hitch It / Ditch It Hot Seat Surviving Creativity Ep. 42 — When your life ... ›

Your mash-up t-shirt is not parody

It happens regularly. An artist is outraged because someone stole their design! And when I click over, I see the design in question is a mash-up between two licensed properties that this person couldn’t possibly have the rights to. In other words, they’re complaining that someone stole the design… that they stole.

And I always see the same justifications:

It’s Fair Use (or parody)!

and

I’m not making any money (or very little) off this!

Wrong, and wrong.

So let’s take a moment to understand Intellectual Property a little better.

“It’s Fair Use!”

First of all, Fair Use has a very clear legal definition. To qualify for “Fair Use” protection, you’d have to prove that the central point of your piece was to make a comment (satire or parody) on the IP — or your work was done in the pursuit of other goals (such as research, education and reporting the news).

So a newspaper can run a photo of Han Solo next to a story about Star Wars: The Force Awakens. That’s allowed under the pursuit of reporting the news. And Saturday Night Live can do a parody of the movie — because that satire makes a comment on the original work.

But a comic that mashes up Han Solo with a muppet — including a clever pun? That’s not commenting on either the Star Wars IP nor the Muppet IP (owned by Disney).

And when you offer that T-shirt for sale, your potential buyers are dominated by two groups — those who are interested in the Star Wars characters and those interested in Muppets.

In fact, if that T-shirt was to start to earn any serious amount of money, those original IP-holders could easily ask for a share. And their case would be easily proved. They’d say… “Hey… would anybody have bought this shirt this if it weren’t for the copyrighted characters?” The answer would be obvious. Burden-of-proof carried.

Very few of those T-shirt buyers are truly there for your work.

Wanna test that theory? Try marketing a few shirts that don’t trample the IP of others. It can be a bracing (and somewhat demoralizing) measurement of just how much you’re really bringing to the table.

“I’m not making any money”

The fact that you’re not making huge profits does not absolve you of copyright compliance. This is the example I use in my Entrepreneurship class at Hussian College: Let’s say you create an image to sell on a T-shirt. You’ve copyrighted that image, and it’s a part of your business. Now I come along, swipe that image, put it on a bunch of T-shirts, and I distribute my shirts to anyone who wants one — for free. You, as the creator of the original image would — rightfully — sue me for copyright infringement on the basis that I’ve harmed your ability to sell shirts by flooding the market with free ones. And you would likely win. And because you could prove monetary damages, I’d be in some serious trouble.

“Stop! (Another) Thief!”

Which makes it all the more entertaining when someone rushes to social media to report that their mash-up T-shirt has been copied by someone else. They’re in the morally shaky ground of having to defend a work that they simply don’t have the rights to. How can you claim someone stole something that was never yours to begin with?

“But so-and-so is doing it, and they’re doing fine”

Sure they are… until, eventually, they rise on the radar of the IP-rights-holder. If the IP-owners decide to exercise their rights, they have plenty of legal grounds to shut the operation down.

Bottom line: Build your own IP

The real danger of treading on the IP of others is simply this: Time wasted can never be restored. The time you’re pumping into IP mash-ups should be time you’re working to build your own IP — so that one day, you actually do bring a legitimate audience to a product. Worse yet, what happens when you get known as the mash-up guy or the mash-up girl? What happens when you try to do something that falls outside of that sphere? Will your audience join you in that new direction? Or will you find out, once and for all, that you don’t have the droids they’re looking for?

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
by Brad Guigar on January 26, 2018
Posted In: Archive Dive
Comments available to logged in users only.


Recent comments

  • Brad Guigar on Blambot Cyber Monday sale
  • rpmichel on Blambot Cyber Monday sale
  • Ian on Webcomics Confidential #44: Twenty Questions, Part 3
  • Brad Guigar on ComicLab 91: One-, Three- and Five-year plans
  • Chad Townsend on ComicLab 91: One-, Three- and Five-year plans

Search




Webcomics.com Poll

I design my comic specifically for smartphones and digital tablets.

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Categories

  • Archive Dive
  • Articles
    • Advertising
    • Art
    • Business
    • Community
    • Conventions
    • Creativity
    • Crowdfunding
    • Digital publishing
    • Image prep
    • Lettering
    • Marketing / Social Media
    • Merchandise
    • Print publishing
    • Tech
    • Web site
      • Web Site Design
    • Writing
  • ComicLab
  • Edited and Ready
  • Events
  • Guest
  • Hot Seat critiques
  • Information
  • Interviews
  • Livestream Chat
  • Mail Bag
  • Member Benefits
  • Promos
  • Site News
  • Studios
  • Surviving Creativity
  • To-Do List
  • Uncategorized
  • Video
  • Webcomics Confidential
  • Webcomics Weekly
  • Webcomics.com Poll

Tags

AdSense advertising Comic Easel comments composition contract copyright creativity exercise credit cards Crowdfunding digital lettering digital publishing Facebook Google Analytics holiday Humor IP KDP Kickstarter Kindle legal lettering line weight Longform comics Manga Studio merchandise NCS panels Patreon Promotion PulsePoint readers revenue SEO shipping social media Square taxes trademark Twitter typography Web design word balloons WordPress writing

Special Features

Just now, in the forum…

  • Side effect from prep for coloring
  • Trying to remember a webcomic
  • Anyone familiar with this Tumblr comic template?
  • Zephers Dream – 1
  • How to make tweets include info about your site

Recent Posts

  • ComicLab Ep 100 — Patreon Assembly
  • ComicLab Ep 99 — Who Can Save a Stumbling Kickstarter?
  • How to do a year-end review of your most popular comics
  • Live by the platform; die by the platform
  • ComicLab Ep. 98 — Special Guest Tom Richmond

Recent Replies

  • Charlie Boatner on Trying to remember a webcomic
  • Charlie Boatner on Zephers Dream – 1
  • Ian on Zephers Dream – 1
  • Sarah Frisk on How to make tweets include info about your site
  • Sarah Frisk on Dynamic Paneling?

Recent Topics

  • Side effect from prep for coloring by Charlie Boatner
  • Trying to remember a webcomic by Charlie Boatner
  • Anyone familiar with this Tumblr comic template? by roninkill
  • Zephers Dream – 1 by Douglas_R32
  • How to make tweets include info about your site by kenned

Recent Comments

  • Brad Guigar on Blambot Cyber Monday sale
  • rpmichel on Blambot Cyber Monday sale
  • Ian on Webcomics Confidential #44: Twenty Questions, Part 3
  • Brad Guigar on ComicLab 91: One-, Three- and Five-year plans
  • Chad Townsend on ComicLab 91: One-, Three- and Five-year plans
  • My Subscription
  • Contact
  • Store
  • Terms of Service
  • Account
  • Membership List

©2007-2019 Webcomics.com | Powered by WordPress with ComicPress | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑